Re: Prefixing names of new filter functions with filter_

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Pierre wrote: > On 9/15/06, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: > > > Yup, that was my whole point as well. > > You are confusing, what is your point? That is important to do it correctly instead of hurry things. > Anyway, I think we have to delay 5.2.0 and solve this naming issue > once and for all. We will need a RC5. Yes > I don't think BC is a problem at this stage, we can break it now and > we should try our best to do not break it after 5.2. At least we can > freeze the API (function names and signatures) now and release a RC5. > > But this extension is experimental, like it or not, that's a fact. > > The only two questions are: > > - do we want filter in 5.2.0? > > - do we want to change the API now or after 5.2.0? > > Two yes mean another RC, yes for ext/filter without API changes mean > we are ready and we can break BC later. I have no problem with > breaking BC after 5.2.0 (experimental). So then we agree I guess... we need to address it before 5.2 which means another RC. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org