Re: Lowercase or camelcase function names?

Hello Johannes, you didn't answer my question... CamelCase or not?? ;) But anyway, thank you for your quick reply. :D I have some code available[1] but since it is a very early stage of development I didn't wanted to tell you already but you provoked me to do it now... ;) The code is based on an extension by Johann Dantant called SCardSCR[2]. My project is found on my personal website[3]. Johann allowed me to relicense his code unter the terms of the PHP license, so I want to use this license! I really would like to use PHP's version control infrastructure in the future. And I really would provide docs in XML format! I am happy that you support this idea. I have the code running here since last year and now I am actively doing smart card development again. I did this for about two years but since around one year I have done other stuff. The code works nice on my notebook and I am very fast in writing prototypes for smart card communication using PHP. Johannes [1] http://code.google.com/p/pcsc-for-php/ [2] http://www.waazaa.org/johann.d/scardscr/ [3] http://hanez.org/pcsc-for-php.html On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:15:47 +0100 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote: > Hi, > > do you already have some code to show? What license are you planning to > use for your code? (PCSC-Lite's license seems to be compatible with > PHP's license) We suggest PHP license 3.01. > > Also: Do you plan to use PHP's version control infrastructure (currently > subversion, will move to git soon)? Would you also be willing to provide > docs in docbook xml format for inclusion in the PHP manual? > > All that aside: In general I'd support it. :-) > > johannes > > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:54 +0100, Johannes wrote: > > Dear developers, > > > > I am currently writing an extension for Smart Card communication from > > within PHP. It uses the PC/SC API and currently I primary take focus on > > Linux based operating systems using PCSC-Lite[1], but that should not > > become a problem... > > > > The PC/SC API is defined very exactly[2] and uses camelcase definition > > for function names. For example to connect to a Smart Card the function > > "SCardConnect" is beeing executed. Is it it a good idea to use the > > same notation in the function name in a PECL extension? I > > prefer to call it "scard_connect"... > > > > You know how to handle this... ;) What should I do? > > > > Thank you very much and regards, > > Johannes > > > > [1] http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/pcsclite.html > > [2] http://www.pcscworkgroup.com/ > > > > -- Johannes Findeisen <mailman@hanez.org>