Re: [PHP4BETA] ZTS mode sooo much slower? (see attachment)
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Thu, 09 Sep 1999 20:33:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] ZTS mode sooo much slower? (see attachment) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4292@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Great! Keep us posted on how you're doing with the Zeus module.
Andi
At 07:55 PM 9/9/99 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
andi, rasmus BTW: quantify is now happy with the performance of zts against non-zts mode! just to let you know.. tc On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Andi Gutmans wrote: At 01:24 PM 9/8/99 -0400, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:--- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/interactiveCVS update :) We added the -B switch to flex++ which tells it not to work inZeev and I messed around with these flags a couple of years ago and apart of making the source and binary much bigger it didn't seem to make much of a performance difference. Probably because in both PHP 3.0 and PHP 4.0 there is only a limited amount of scanning done at the beginning of script execution and scanning isn't our application's main execution time. Andi --- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/ -- PHP 4 Betamode but read blocks of data. The regular C scanner is smart enough toknowwhether it is running interactively or not, the C++ scanner isn't.Argh! Too simple. Can some of the other flex++ flags be used? Like -Cf or -CF?Thies C. Arntzen "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!" Digital Collections Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180 Hammerbrookstr. 93 20097 Hamburg / Germany-- PHP 4 Beta