Re: PHP-WEBMASTER: /web/php/branches/PROTOTYPE_2010/

From: Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:37:41 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP-WEBMASTER: /web/php/branches/PROTOTYPE_2010/
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.webmaster 
Request: Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-8258@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On the last note about not just working on a manual page, can we get a php.net homepage design mocked up ? keeping the header from the docs page. Does that sound like a plan forward ? Do we have any design (graphics) oriented people involved who are happy to mock something up ? Cheers. PD. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson < hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 13:36, Paul Dragoonis <dragoonis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Hannes Magnusson > > <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:33, Paul Dragoonis <dragoonis@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > So who likes the idea of having recommended results on the search > >> > results > >> > page, > >> > and who likes the ideas of also having some recommended results if the > >> > autocomplete returns 0 results. > >> > > >> > >> Keep in mind that by the time this is finished most browser will have > >> implemented a good chunk of the HTML5 and the DOMStorage specs, so we > >> could push all sorts of data to the client, incrementally adding more > >> stuff to it on every search or whatever we would like. > >> > > > > Realistically we need to create against what technologies are available > now > > with an open mind of what will be available to us in future. When XHTML5 > + > > DOMStorage becomes a standard in all major supported browsers then we can > > look into refactoring it for new emerging technologies. > > It already is (see Jordis reply). > We have no interest in supporting legacy browsers, plus the fact > people using legacy browsers are in no way our target audience. > > > > >> I however consider this discussion premature (and will be very hard to > >> track down in the archives due to misleading subject). > >> > >> We need to work on refactoring the existing content and design a layout > >> for it. > >> What fancy features and functionality we will then provide can be > >> discussed and implemented. > >> > > > > I think the design for the page on http://prototype.php.net"]½ > > [uÆ/6œf³Íð5 is good for > us > > to move on and focus on other aspects such as interaction with > javascript. > > Then you misunderstand entirely the reason for the redesign. > We need *content refactoring*. We have bunch of gold in random > sidebars and in deeply nested pages which people simply don't know > about. > > We need to reorganize the entire website, not just mock up a random manual > page. > > > -Hannes >

« previous php.webmaster (#8258) next »