Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?
| From: | Ilia Alshanetsky | Date: | Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:43:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7541@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-1 It has never been the policy of PHP, let alone PECL to reject
extensions based on commercial libs. PHP has always been a "connector"
, to restrict it from being able to connect to various libraries seems
to go contrary to PHP's policies and practices.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> As you noticed today, there is a little debate about accepting
> commercial libraries binding in pecl. It is a gray area so let decide
> whether we want extensions for commercial only libraries (not related
> to operating systems but libraries). By commercial only I mean
> libraries like libpdf or libxl (recently propoosed).
>
> Please vote +1 to reject commercial only libraries binding and -1 to allow them.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>