Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?

From: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:22:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?
References: 1  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7585@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hi everyone, Thanks for your votes :) The result is clear and I have updated the request page accordingly: http://pecl.php.net/account-request.php Cheers, On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > As you noticed today, there is a little debate about accepting > commercial libraries binding in pecl. It is a gray area so let decide > whether we want extensions for commercial only libraries (not related > to operating systems but libraries). By commercial only I mean > libraries like libpdf or libxl (recently propoosed). > > Please vote +1 to reject commercial only libraries binding and -1 to allow them. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | > http://www.libgd.org > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.pecl.dev (#7585) next »