Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?
| From: | Tomasz Krawczyk | Date: | Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:55:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7577@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre Joye pisze:
hi, As you noticed today, there is a little debate about accepting commercial libraries binding in pecl. It is a gray area so let decide whether we want extensions for commercial only libraries (not related to operating systems but libraries). By commercial only I mean libraries like libpdf or libxl (recently propoosed). Please vote +1 to reject commercial only libraries binding and -1 to allow them.+1 I'm against extensions binding to commercial libraries. Let this extension be published on the authors website. If it is so good I will find it and I will buy it. Tomek