Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?
| From: | Gustavo Lopes | Date: | Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:57:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7557@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:46:49 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs <info@tyrael.hu> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>wrote:Whether or not I agree with declining wrappers for LGPL libraries (I don't), that's the current policy. I think accepting wrappers for commercial libraries doesn't make sense given the LGPL policy, hence I vote +1. -- Gustavo Lopes+1; I don't see any rationale for "strongly discouraging" LGPL v2 libraries and prohibiting LGPL v3 ones, yet accepting commercial libraries.If you don't see rationale, then you should vote for -1.