Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?

From: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:17:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Inclusion of extension relying on commercial only libraries?
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7579@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hi Stig, On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Stig Bakken <stig.bakken@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 - I would be really annoyed if trying to install some useful-sounding > extension only to discover I needed to cash out for a commercial library > even to test it. > What about having a separate official channel for this? That's something we could provide (but not sure that's what people wants either, given the current vote result) but at least the web site will have a tag to mark such extensions (or for other info). It is not possible to fix current installers to use them, but maybe something can be done in pyrus. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.pecl.dev (#7579) next »