Re: template engine...why???

"Justin French" <justin@indent.com.au> wrote in message news:BAD736E9.25D0A%justin@indent.com.au... > In all honesty, I find it very hard to listen to your arguments. > > They may be right, and they may be wrong, but the fact remains that you have > a commercial interest in arguing the side of templates (and your product > TemplateTamer), which is just like a butcher arguing the benefits of > including meat in your diet. In the signature of all my posts I am including link to the TemplateTamer, so I think I have made quite clear that I am connected to it, and from that it follows that I do have interest that it succedes. However I do not think that excludes me form arguing about templates, what are prons and cons, and how does the TT fit in the scene from my view. I also often try to point out that many of the issues are in the area of personal and style, that there other approaches as well, and I often point readers to other template systems, and that people should lear about the options but in the end use what they find best for them. In the end, I believe that arguments and opinons should be able to stand by themselves, regardless of who made them. I have made known my relation to the TT so that people can put what I am saying to more scrutiny, but I think that there is really nothing wrong with me expressing what I think here, and explaining how TT works when the subject is templates. It is by all means your choice what will you read, and with how much effort, but if my posts fail in non-credible for you, I am sorry, and I will certanly miss your (or everyone elses with same stance) reading, since I have tried to sincerely express what do I think. Thanks for the honesty, however, it was as always very valuable. Sincerely, rush -- http://www.templatetamer.com/