Re: Re: Announcing PHP-GTK-EDGE
| From: | Lars J. | Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:31:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Announcing PHP-GTK-EDGE | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev php.gtk.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-3693@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
As I am working with gtksheet, I was missing a function which I wrote
(nothing really, after some help though..), but here is the patch which
creates gtksheet->get_active_cell and it works perfectly here (it was
made against the newest php-gtk-edge)
hope it can be useful for something :)
Best regards
Lars
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Anant Narayanan wrote:
>> Uh no, what gives you that idea? I didn't want to put those patches in
>> the real CVS (once bitten, twice shy); so I put them somewhere else.
>> When these patches are considered stable enough to be in the main tree;
>> it'll go in.
>
> Are you offering patches or full source tree? Because your message
> made it sound like it was the latter. I don't have a problem with
> patches, but having another copy of PHP-GTK source tree, especially
> one that purports to have the latest bleeding edge enhancements, is
> not something I like.
>
>> I remember asking in a mail sometime ago (I quote):
>>
>>> Andrei, I've looked through this and can commit a set of patches that
>>> would allow us to build against the latest detected version of Gtk+ on
>>> the user's system (which can also be overridden with the ./configure
>>> switch).
>>
>> I received no green signal from you on this, so I assumed you didn't
>> want 2.10 support to go in yet.
>
> I've sent a couple of replies on this topic to php-gtk-dev and did not
> get any response to them either, except from Steph, but was a one
> liner that didn't answer my questions. So we did not come to a
> consensus on the multi-version builds. As for your patches to the
> build system, I haven't seen them yet either. If you can send them to
> the php-gtk-dev mailing list so we can take a look at them, I'd
> appreciate it.
>
> -Andrei
>