Re: Re: [VOTE] array_column() function

From: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:11:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] array_column() function
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-64941@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 14 Jan 2013, at 12:57, Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net> wrote: > On 1/14/13 11:54 AM, Scott MacVicar wrote: >> On 14 Jan 2013, at 11:37, Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net> wrote: >> >>> On 1/11/13 6:17 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>>> I've opened voting for the array_column() function RFC. >>>> >>>> You can vote at >>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_column#voting >>> >>> I have updated the pull request by removing the array_pluck() alias. I favor the >>> array_column() alias, as it is more in keeping with other function names like array_keys() and >>> array_values(), which do not have verbs in them. >>> >>> If the RFC is accepted, I will submit a new pull request against the 5.5 branch and >>> close the current pull request against the 5.3 branch. If I should do that now, please let me know, >>> and I'll go ahead and take care of it. >> >> I've talked about the Facebook version of this when the key bit got added, but we have >> 2 other methods to go with it. >> >> mpull() which does methods >> >> https://github.com/facebook/libphutil/blob/master/src/utils/utils.php#L110 >> >> ppull() which does properties >> >> https://github.com/facebook/libphutil/blob/master/src/utils/utils.php#L184 >> >> Not sure if these should be added separately? The property version is good for PDO when >> using FETCH_CLASS. >> >> - S >> > > I did review these, and I like them, but I think they should be added separately, especially > since they deal more with objects than arrays. As long as the work with objects that implement ArrayAccess then it should be fine? - S

« previous php.internals (#64941) next »