Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator

From: Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:30:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77090@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Andrea, On Sep 6, 2014 2:03 AM, "Andrea Faulds" <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > Good evening, > > I’ve written an RFC and working patch which attempt to add this feature which has been often requested: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/isset_ternary I did not look at the patch yet but I like it from a feature point of view. We should have had this since long :) Cheers, Pierre

« previous php.internals (#77090) next »