Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator
| From: | Shashank Kumar | Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:20:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77271@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Really, you should thank Nikita, not me. He wrote the patch. ^^
He gets my bag of thanks for many things.
> Well, the patch is written for master. It could be back ported, but I
don’t know how.
> Also, even if there is a 5.7, it sounds like it will consist purely of
bug fixes and E_DEPRECATED warnings.
Backward-compatible feature additions won't harm 5.7 and probably be a good
upgrade path to 7 but that's a discussion
for some future time.
Given that accepted intdiv rfc is targeted to 5.7 I thought it will be ok
here as well.