Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator

From: Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:34:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77310@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 12:41 +0100, Andrea Faulds wrote: > We could use a function *syntax*, though, but I don’t like this idea. > coalesce() and ifsetor() are both ugly to me, and it’s not super > obvious what they do: > > var_dump(coalesce($_GET[‘foobar’], 3)); > > vs. > > var_dump($_GET[‘foobar’] ?? 3); > > ?? also has the advantage of being shorter. > If you don't now what ?? does it's far from obvious. coalesce is a term that can be put into google and will deliver results. johannes

« previous php.internals (#77310) next »