Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator

From: Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:04:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Implicit isset() in Shorthand Ternary Operator
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77102@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Andrea Rather than giving a new meaning to an old operator why not have a different operator for this? .NET has a 'null coalescing' operator for the same purpose which works out quite well in the given situation and is non-ambiguous as well. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173224.aspx ​

« previous php.internals (#77102) next »