Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:53:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-81316@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>
> Discussion has been very low on this topic since it was proposed on
> August 19th, so I just opened the vote on the RFC whether to add
> pecl_http to the core. The vote will be open until about 12:00 UTC on
> Friday, February 6th.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#vote
I wish you had pinged the list before opening the vote. I know there were a
few people who wanted to make comments but have just been very busy. For
example, I have been dealing with the return types RFC which has soaked up
all of the time I have for working on PHP projects.
Some feedback: I feel the RFC is not clear about the advantages and
disadvantages of including this package. Mostly, the RFC is "hey I have
this package can we include it in core?" I feel like it's fairly incomplete
as to *why* we should include it. There is a fair amount of work done in
user-land for these types of utilities, and I think without a more balanced
discussion we'd be giving this extension a distinct advantage.
If we allow it to remain in voting phase despite these issues, I have to
vote no simply because I don't feel like there is enough information
presented in the RFC for anyone except current pecl_http users to make a
good decision; that's hardly a good situation for the language as a whole.