Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

2015-01-29 14:07 GMT+01:00 Pavel Kouřil <pajousek@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Discussion has been very low on this topic since it was proposed on > > August 19th, so I just opened the vote on the RFC whether to add > > pecl_http to the core. The vote will be open until about 12:00 UTC on > > Friday, February 6th. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#vote > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Mike > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > Hello, > > just one observation - would be the name of the classes and namespaces > stay the same after merging? I personally find the lowercased > namespace name kinda weird, given that most of code written in PHP > I've seen is using CamelCase. > > Maybe there should be an RFC which would standardize naming and etc. > for future features? > > > > Regards > Pavel Kouril > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > +1 on that if the component getting merged. Would also be fine if the rest would follow PSR1+2 (for the public signatures only of course)