Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

Hi all, On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2015 9:08 PM, "Pavel Kouřil" <pajousek@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > There is zero reason to discuss what has been approved and followed for > > > years already. > > > > > > I will simply post the link to our CS as a reminder and ask everyone to > > > read it if they never did: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/CODING_STANDARDS > > > > Well, the coding standard doesn't mention namespaces. So shouldn't it > > be updated to include namespaces? If there's an RFC for including > > something using namespaces, the should be rules for naming namespaces > > in the coding standard, IMHO. > > It sounds pretty obvious but yes it should be mentioned for completeness. +1 I don't want to see no more methods names like __set_state, create_sid, function names like gd*(), and of course strange namespaces. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net