Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

Hey everyone, > On 28 Jan 2015, at 20:46, Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com> wrote: > > Since PSR-7 is being discussed now *and* pecl_http can't implement an interface that still > is being discussed, I would rather vote "no" now and maybe change my mind in future if > PSR-7 becomes a thing and pecl_http follows. Or PSR-7 fails, for that matter. Related to this: is it even possible for an internal class to rely on and formally, explicitly “implement” a userland interface? It’s all very well if PHP has a built-in implementation that follows PSR-7, but it would suck if you couldn’t pass an instance of that class to a function with a (hypothetical) psr7\HttpMessage type hint. Userland libraries don’t have this issue: they all just require the PSR-7 interface package in their composer.json and all is well. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/