Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

Hi, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On 29/01/2015 10:41, Andrey Andreev wrote: >> >> It's not about whether we like the FIG's direction or what "PSR" >> stands for (which doesn't make sense btw) - that is indeed OT. >> >> My message was different: the PHP RFC process can't get blocked >> because of a third-party group, especially if your reasoning for that >> is to follow "standards" which aren't standards at all. >> >> Anyway, hopefully there will be more details on this RFC once voting >> is restarted so we don't have to have such silly arguments. > > > I'm not sure why you're turning this into a crusade against FIG and PSRs. > Your argument is valid, but I'm afraid that's the message you conveyed much > louder than the actual argument itself. > My last message was intended to clarify that this is *not* a rant about the FIG or PSRs, but a concern about proper reasoning in votes. I didn't want to have another reply because this is all off-topic at this point, but now you insist that I am in fact having a crusade against PHP-FIG - I'm not, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. Let's leave it at that please. Cheers, Andrey.