Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
| From: | Crypto Compress | Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:18:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-81375@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?possible points: - PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does - PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without dependencies by every simple script - PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten years - PSR-7 can be complementary to pecl_http not the other way around (c code can't use php code?) - native implementations should be faster