Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

Hey, > On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:10, Crypto Compress <cryptocompress@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I would go with Http\ > > Why not the reserved Php\Http\? This sounds good to me. php\ is already reserved, and it’s similar to the common community convention of vendor\packagename. (e.g. ajf\escapes.) Would work well with Composer and Packagist too, as it could be a virtual php/http package (Packagist naming convention). Also, I’d like to say I’d prefer php\HTTP or php\http over php\Http. Capitalising an acronym doesn’t feel right to me, perhaps because case is usually significant, Following the Casing Rules Used by Titles. Of php\HTTP and php\http, php\http is probably better since the case matches that of php\. It could also be PHP\HTTP, I guess, but lowercase is somehow more appealing to me. Thoughts? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/