Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

On 05/02/15 10:03, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Yes, I mean $_POST (and $_FILES). It's been requested multiple times, >> but I know it's quite controversial. I think this approach is better >> than any other proposed yet (think $_PUT and stuff). > > You're building an OO next-generation API, why you still need $_PUT or > $_FILES or anything like that? Just make a nice OO API where the client > can request the data cleanly, and hide the details of where they come > from. Which would probably also make an added value of making these > things actually testable with some minimal API support, without messing > with superglobals and general extreme ugliness. > Because PHP soaks up all data on POST and leaves us without php://input, so on POST it would be PHP that decides what to happen, and on any other method it would be pecl/http. That seems to cry out loud for inconsistencies. Anyway, that feature is not of that huge practical use, that it deserves argumenting too long about it. I'll remove that section. -- Regards, Mike