Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: > Hi! > > Do we want to discuss anything further before I put this to vote again? > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http > > Points explicitely marked for discussion in the RFC itself: > > * pecl/propro > Proxies for properties representing state in internal C structs > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#peclpropro > > * pecl/raphf > (Persistent) handle management within objects instead of resources > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#peclraphf > Also, take special note of the INI setting: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#raphf_ini_setting > > * POST parsing disregarding request method, solely based on content-type > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#rinit > > JFYI, I've create a POC for HTTP2 support: > > http://git.php.net/?p=pecl/http/pecl_http.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/http2-poc > > This is for PHP5, though, and needs a recent libcurl built with nghttp2 > support. > > -- > Regards, > Mike > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > Hello, as I mentioned already in the other thread - there are currently no coding standards related to namespace naming in https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/CODING_STANDARDS and the coding standards should probably be updated before voting, since this extension contains namespaces. Regards Pavel Kouril