Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

Hi, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > Hey, > >> On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:23, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote: >> >> I'm not sure about namespacing it in the first place, but otherwise I >> agree with you - acronyms should be capitalised. > > What’s your objection? We either namespace it, or we have to add some weird prefix to avoid > conflicts. I’d rather we not have the prefix. > > The global namespace is already plenty polluted. Sure, most extensions so far don’t use > namespaces, but that’s because they were written before 5.3 came out. I think it’s time to move > on. Users know what namespaces are now, I don’t think it’d cause problems. > I'm not objecting it really, just haven't had a detailed look at it yet and so far there's no core/bundled extension that is namespaced (the ever-present "consistency" argument ... *cough*). Cheers, Andrey.