Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package
| From: | Christian Dickmann | Date: | Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:59:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13219@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Well, as there is an obvious opposition to commiting my changes into the
> IT[X] package, I'd rather finish banging my head against the wall. I can
> understand the reasoning against my changes, though can't say that I
> agree with it.
You don't get it, do you?
We are _not_ against your changes! str instead of preg would be
nice, IF optional. global vars are nice too! I would _love_ to see this
in IT. We should only keep BC in mind.
The cache is a diffrent issue ... PA doesn't want it to be inside
IT, but I have a question: how optional is it?
Something like
IT::loadTemplateFile($filename, $removeUnknownVariables = true,
$removeEmptyBlocks = true, $cacheFile = false);
would not break BC, wouldn't harm PA, but would add additional
features for those who want it. How many lines of code are we talking
about here?
Christian Dickmann