Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package

From: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:59:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13219@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Well, as there is an obvious opposition to commiting my changes into the > IT[X] package, I'd rather finish banging my head against the wall. I can > understand the reasoning against my changes, though can't say that I > agree with it. You don't get it, do you? We are _not_ against your changes! str instead of preg would be nice, IF optional. global vars are nice too! I would _love_ to see this in IT. We should only keep BC in mind. The cache is a diffrent issue ... PA doesn't want it to be inside IT, but I have a question: how optional is it? Something like IT::loadTemplateFile($filename, $removeUnknownVariables = true, $removeEmptyBlocks = true, $cacheFile = false); would not break BC, wouldn't harm PA, but would add additional features for those who want it. How many lines of code are we talking about here? Christian Dickmann

« previous php.pear.dev (#13219) next »