Re: Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package

le 13/02/03 14:00, Christian Dickmann à chrisdicki@gmx.de a écrit : >> Christian, I beg your pardon, but if you bothered to read the readme > file or >> *gasp* even consult the sources of my fork, instead of making guesses you >> should be able to see that caching >> 1) Is optional; >> 2) Is completely transparent; >> 3) Does not affect BC. > > Then you get a +1 on the caching from me. > About how many lines of code are we talking here? > (Sorry, can have a look later, but have to leave now) > >> Now, would you please vote on my proposal? TIA. > > -1 on a seperate package. Integration (not replacement) of your > work into IT without any BC breaks get a clear +1. I agree with Christian, don't make a different package, there is already many different template engines in PEAR. +1 to integrate your changes in IT. +1 for you to become the second lead developer of this package. +1 for you to make unit tests, if you have the time. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam