Re: Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package

Am Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:59:10 +0100 schrieb "Christian Dickmann" <chrisdicki@gmx.de>: > > Well, as there is an obvious opposition to commiting my changes into the > > IT[X] package, I'd rather finish banging my head against the wall. I can > > understand the reasoning against my changes, though can't say that I > > agree with it. > > You don't get it, do you? > We are _not_ against your changes! str instead of preg would be > nice, IF optional. global vars are nice too! I would _love_ to see this > in IT. We should only keep BC in mind. > The cache is a diffrent issue ... PA doesn't want it to be inside > IT, but I have a question: how optional is it? > Something like > IT::loadTemplateFile($filename, $removeUnknownVariables = true, > $removeEmptyBlocks = true, $cacheFile = false); > would not break BC, wouldn't harm PA, but would add additional > features for those who want it. How many lines of code are we talking > about here? I´m still thinking factory: $tpl = HTML_Template_IT::factory(); // Classic version $tpl = HTML_Template_IT::factory("cached"); // Cache-Enabled version $tpl = HTML_Template_IT::factory("noregexp"); // Uses str_replace but // no cache to enable // <!-- INCLUDE ... $tpl = HTML_Template_IT::factory("ext"); // Uses PECL extension, once // it´s available ..I think this would be the most elegant solution... Regards, Markus -- *21st Media* | Consulting, Konzeption, Produktion für die Bereiche: Markus Wolff | Internet, Intranet, eCommerce, Content Management, Hamburg,Germany | Softwareentwicklung, 3D-Animation, Videostreaming http://21st.de | Tel. [+49](0)40/6887949-0, Fax: [+49](0)40/6887949-1