Re: Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:23:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposal: IT[X] fork as a new package | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13226@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
13 Февраль 2003 16:00, Christian Dickmann написал:
> > Christian, I beg your pardon, but if you bothered to read the readme
>
> file or
>
> > *gasp* even consult the sources of my fork, instead of making guesses you
> > should be able to see that caching
> > 1) Is optional;
> > 2) Is completely transparent;
> > 3) Does not affect BC.
>
> Then you get a +1 on the caching from me.
> About how many lines of code are we talking here?
> (Sorry, can have a look later, but have to leave now)
About 70-80 lines of code. With documentation and blank lines, this would be
about 150.
And in fact, it _does_ somehow affect BC: if you switch caching on, then the
templates will not be parsed for <!-- INCLUDE --> calls and callbacks. If you
don't use caching it will (well, it should) behave like the stock version.
> > Now, would you please vote on my proposal? TIA.
>
> -1 on a seperate package. Integration (not replacement) of your
> work into IT without any BC breaks get a clear +1.
Seems that I have to work on test suite then. 'Cause without it, it will be
impossible to prove anything about BC.