Re: PFC-RFC Update

El Mar 25 Feb 2003 12:13, Christian Stocker escribió: > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 15:49, Paul Cooper wrote: > > I think the RFC is great and agree wholeheartedly. > > > > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 12:15, Christian Stocker wrote: > > > > > > - PFCs are automatically tested on upload. If tests fail, the package > > > will not be published (multiple platform testing?) > > > > I don't think all testing can be automatic, e.g. for the unit tests for > > MDB you need to specify the dsn of the database system you're running > > the tests on. MDB and DB run on several database systems and they would > > the tests would need to pass on all databases supported. > > that's a valid point. Automatic unittesting is more a way to ensure, > nothing bad happens in the upload. If some things can't be tested, so be > it. Better do some testing, than no testing. And multiple platform > testing won't be possible anyway, or does pear/php have a windows/osx > server at hand? Supposing there are no available servers for automatic testing of all OSes, we could have a table resuming the testing status for each package and each version on pear.php.net: Testing stats for version 0.1: ---------------------- | OS | tested | ------------------ | Linux | yes | | OSX | yes | | Solaris | no | | Windows | no | --------------------- Who would update this table? any PEAR developer? anyone? members of a PEAR "testing task force"? why do I try to answer questions with more questions? who knows...