Re: Re: PFC-RFC Update
| From: | rocha at i-node dot com dot br | Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:53:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PFC-RFC Update | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13945@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Citando Pierre-Alain Joye <paj@pearfr.org>:
Hi,
> About PFC itself, I am still not sure this is a good idea to split PEAR
> in 2 parts, to do not say against the split. But this is a good idea to
> label a package for his quality, standart conformance, successfully ran
> tests on each required platform. This should be an usefull addin,
> besides the package status(beta, stable, alpha,...).
Weel, as soon as you put a quality rank on pear classes you have split it in
parts, like it or not. If you call it PFC or GBE (the Good, the Bad and the
Evil), it doesnt matter.
Sebastiao Rocha.
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/