Re: Re: PFC-RFC Update

Xavier Noguer <xnoguer@rezebra.com> artikulierte: > I agree with Tobias that a binary system (PFC/Non PFC) is not the > ideal, and a system with PFC and "on the way to become" PFC packages > is better. Users should be able to view "how" PFC compliant a package > is. It seems very different to me saying "package X is non PFC", than > saying "package X complies with 13 out of 14 criteria needed for > PFCness". Thats what i meant (not exactly, but mainly). >> - A core PFC group will have to personally review a PFC candidate and >> manually elevate it to "Approved PFC" level. This last manual step >> is IMHO neccessary to avoid manipulation of the voting mechanism >> and ensure quality. > This seems like a good idea. And this core-team should give the rating i thought about. -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2* 5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2* 23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>