Re: PEAR Meeting - Summary online

Hi! Lukas Smith wrote:

Actually both of these points were written by me. Regarding ITX-Sigma: We did not have a detailed discussion of this. However there were even some direct references to this being a good example of where a PEAR Group might have prevented greater harm. I know that George touched upon it briefly and I am very sure that I actually explicitly mentioned it as well. The example itself was mostly a cut and paste from a comment from Wolfram who commented on the prelease version (see below).

Lukas, what was the *purpose* of this thing appearing in the summary? And what exactly is this mythical 'greater harm'? Unless you can answer both of the questions without much BS, I suggest removing the passage. Thanks in advance.