Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.

From: Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:03:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19193@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:16:42 +0200 Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote: > <paj@pearfr.org> wrote : > > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 19:31:26 -0300 > > Leandro Lucarella <luca@lucarella.com.ar> wrote: > > > >> HTML_Image: > >> HTML_Link: > > > > Both should fit in HTML_Common. imho. I'm -1 to create independant > > packages for such things. > > What fits in HTML_Common is none of your business. Apparently, you > have no idea what HTML_Common's purpose is. In other words, I'm against to get this kind of "features" in a package. Then HTML_Common as a base for such things fits perfectly its purpose. And still apparently, I'm not alone to think that. Maybe you would like to enlight us with your powerful knowledge? pierre.

« previous php.pear.dev (#19193) next »