Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Davey, el domingo 3 de agosto a las 18:44 me escribiste: > Width and Height are only to specified when overriding the images actual > height, and I'm pretty sure are no longer valid in XHTML as they are > deprecated in favour of CSS. > > <spec> > height %Length; #IMPLIED -- override height -- > width %Length; #IMPLIED -- override width -- > </spec> > > Consider using in-line CSS to set the width/height, <img style="width: > 100px; height: 50px;" src="foo.jpg" /> will still give you the benefits > you mentioned above (these are simply benefits, not required of the UA > by the spec). width and height are both XHTML compiliant (even in Strict type documents). Only "align", "border", "hspace", and "vspace" are deprecated. At least this is what http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp says (sorry about the .asp ;-) - -- LUCA - Leandro Lucarella - Usando Debian GNU/Linux Sid - GNU Generation - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Mail / JID: luca@lugmen.org.ar GPG Fingerprint: D9E1 4545 0F4B 7928 E82C 375D 4B02 0FE0 B08B 4FB2 GPG Key: gpg --keyserver pks.lugli.org.ar --recv-keys B08B4FB2 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ System horror on C: Disco chungo. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/LVjQSwIP4LCLT7IRAphaAKCS0GXVjkGY60sQoEXIix38qUduQACfRPhH P/NMtcUTSD9MUMADaaFR/hU= =B5yv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----