Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.

From: Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:31:37 +0000
Subject: Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19214@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:25:01 +0200 Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote: > Good idea, I am also going to add <br>, <hr> and <blink>... > > Seriously, HTML_Common purpose is not to add html tags to html > documents, but to handle html attributes and html outputs. It's used > by other classes and needs to be as fast as possible for these tasks. > Please look at the code. > > If you really want to add img and link, they'll have to be extra > packages. But I doubt the usefulness of such packages on a wider > scale. You got my idea :). Do not bloat anything with this kind of stuff, and group all these functions in one packages, extend HTML_Common if required. But I still doubt of the need of it... But well if there is a lot of people (more than +5 minus all -1 including mine :) ) that vote for, we have to accept;). pierre

« previous php.pear.dev (#19214) next »