Re: Package(s) proposal(s): HTML_Image and HTML_Link.

<paj@pearfr.org> wrote : > On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:25:01 +0200 > Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote: > > >> Good idea, I am also going to add <br>, <hr> and <blink>... >> >> Seriously, HTML_Common purpose is not to add html tags to html >> documents, but to handle html attributes and html outputs. It's used >> by other classes and needs to be as fast as possible for these tasks. >> Please look at the code. >> >> If you really want to add img and link, they'll have to be extra >> packages. But I doubt the usefulness of such packages on a wider >> scale. > > You got my idea :). Do not bloat anything with this kind of stuff, and > group all these functions in one packages, extend HTML_Common if > required. But I still doubt of the need of it... But well if there is a > lot of people (more than +5 minus all -1 including mine :) ) that vote > for, we have to accept;). OK, we all agree then. Good night ;) Bertrand Mansion Mamasam