RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: UDDI

Hi, > As long as there's no PEAR error handling and it solves the same well, PEAR error handling is not a PEAR requirement yet, but the first release of this package will of course throw PEAR errors. > and that bug-fixes in HTTP_Request fix bugs in UDDI? We currently only have one part of the code that does an HTTP request, using no special functionality (just open connection, send data, get back raw response) so I personally do not see an immediate need for using HTTP_Request yet. But of course it would be no big deal to implement that. It might just delay new releases a bit since/if there is more one has to change, but timing probably is not crucial :) Regards Christian