RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: UDDI
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:05:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: UDDI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19546@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: Christian Wenz [mailto:christian@wenz.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 8:32 AM
> > and that bug-fixes in HTTP_Request fix bugs in UDDI?
>
> We currently only have one part of the code that does an HTTP request,
> using no special functionality (just open connection, send data, get
> back raw response) so I personally do not see an immediate need for
> using HTTP_Request yet. But of course it would be no big deal to
> implement that. It might just delay new releases a bit since/if there
is
> more one has to change, but timing probably is not crucial :)
just as a general note:
PEAR actually does not want too many dependencies. If a package just
needs another package in a few (like 1-2) places than probably code
duplication is better than adding a dependency. However when the uses
increase you should consider a (optional) dependency.
Regards,
Lukas