Re: Package Proposal: UDDI

Hi Lukas, > just as a general note: > PEAR actually does not want too many dependencies. If a package just > needs another package in a few (like 1-2) places than probably code > duplication is better than adding a dependency. However when the uses > increase you should consider a (optional) dependency. I can live with that, too. For me, a PEAR error handling is top of the list, but I have mixed emotions about HTTP_Request (since there is exactly one place where this is done). But I can live with both. Thanks for your note! Best, Christian