AW: [PEAR-DEV] Re: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pear-dev/1800030

From: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:48:05 +0000
Subject: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Re: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pear-dev/1800030
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21354@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, > Can you explain how it is incompatible? I know that @desc is not in the > PHPDoc standard, but how does this break compatibility? A PHPDoc parser > should still be able to figure it out, and ignore @desc. That said - I > think it would be a good idea to add @desc to the standard, for short one > line descriptions. That's why we added it in the first place. First off, I'm not using the Zend IDE, but users of our classes complained that our documetation format would be wrong and is not accepted by the Zend IDE. We are using @param string $myParam my parameter And the Zend IDE expects: @param $myParam string my parameter Not sure if that still is (or ever was) an issue, but that's what people were complaining about. Stephan

« previous php.pear.dev (#21354) next »