Re: [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR [hopefully the final draft]
| From: | Markus Wolff | Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:21:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR [hopefully the final draft] | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21974@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lukas Smith wrote:
Being one of those who haven't participated in the discussion, I'd like to remark that I did in fact think you guys are on crack when I first saw the naming standard proposal with the major revision numbers within the package name. I didn't see the advantages, only the possible complications - but your previous mail with the framework example explained the benefits really well, and now I'm all for it (having a framework with a similar concept and similar problems). Maybe this example should be added to the RFC for better understanding. CU MarkusLet's bring this to a final ...I dont want to burst your bubble. But only a small subgroup of pear-dev have participated in this discussion. We are more like a small subgroup that worked on creating a proposal. Now we have to convince the rest of the world that we were not smoking crack :-)