Re: [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR[hopefully the final draft]

<zitiere wer="Alexey Borzov"> > Lukas Smith wrote: >> Well your argument can be taken both ways. >> So if there is no problem time when it an upgrade is released, why is it >> that running a simple regexp is such a huge deal? > It would have been a simple regexp *if* PHP had package/module/namespace > support > on language level. In the current situation it would be a *complex* regexp > to > change classes, constants, include paths, whatever. What's so complex about preg_replace('/[^$]Foo/', '/Foo/') (not tested)? > Some subtle bugs can be > introduced. See my "hack upon a hack" argument. > BTW, if Pierre-Alain and myself have common viewpoint on something, that's a > clear indication of big problems in the proposal. ;D ;-P -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>