RE: [PEAR-DEV] [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:29:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21994@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: Tobias Schlitt [mailto:tobias@schlitt.info]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: pear-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in
PEAR
>
>
> Zitat von Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net>:
>
> >> Of course, I'd like to know what everyone thinks - is the error
message
> >> need worth the extra "_v" ? Or should we go with Alan's suggestion
> >> below?
>
> Greg, I agree with you. I like the Foo_vX method much more that FooX.
The
> LDAP/DB2/... examples raise IMHO much higher than one PEAR package
(IPv4).
Especially the extra underscore highlights the fact that it is a postfix
and not part of the package name.
Regards,
Lukas