RE: [PEAR-DEV] [RFC_v3] Handling Backwards Compatibility in PEAR [hopefully the final draft]

<zitiere wer="Stefan Neufeind"> >> > Hehe ... sure we ... hmm ... didn't :-)) Well but I think the people >> > who took place in this discussion could somehow be called current >> > "core" of the pear-dev-ml, don't you think? >> Hi Stefan! >> I disagree with that. There should be no "core" of PEAR. We have the >> PEAR group as it's official core. That lasts. >> But I agree that the proposal should be finished. This is OpenSource, >> so every PEAR attendant has the possibility to read the mailinglist >> and to give his/her oppinion to an RFC. So, if nobody is quite against >> a proposal and enought people vote for that, it should become >> standard. > Hmm - hope nobody got this wrong again :-)) Don't think so! ;) Some of the other had even got more rude tone against me in former times! ;) (Without looking at anyone... ;) > I wasn't talking about > "power to the people" but about "if the currently active people on > the mailinglist managed to iron out their disagrees then it might be > the right time to move this on to the pear-group". Don't shoot me > because I used the word "core", okay? I think that was no shot at you, just a statement! ;) Anyway, IMHO if someone does not vote against a proposal he agrees with it silently. If he has something to say, he can do so. Or? Regards, Toby -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>