Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Proposal: HTTP_Download (another tiny package :)
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:12:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [PEAR-DEV] Proposal: HTTP_Download (another tiny package :) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22137@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sunday, September 28, 2003, 6:51:07 PM, Stephan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>> - The name for me, sounds as a client downloader class. I'd preffer a
>> more clear one, don't know, HTTP_Send, HTTP_SendFile,
>> HTTP_Server_Download, ..
> I'd vote against HTTP_Server_Download, as this implies that the class is
> related to HTTP_Server (which it isn't).
There is already a HTTP package and it is not related to HTTP_Server,
do we agree? :-) The PEAR package names reflects functionality and
name spaces not really isolated names. Dependecies and subpackages (if
ever get into) shows if related or not, not just the name.
--
Tomas V.V.Cox mailto:cox@idecnet.com