Re: 'PHPMake'
| From: | alex black | Date: | Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:53:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 'PHPMake' | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2352@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> As you probably now we have yet our system for packages creation,
> enterily written in PHP, xml based and multiplatform. Ok, it has yet no
> support for some things like dependencies, but will have it.
>
> What other things you might want?
>
> Tomas V.V.Cox
>
> PS.- FYI, I see in your "TODO" list the creation of a phpdoc script, I
> made one :-)
Yes, I saw that.. and I'm going to use it :)
To answer your other question:
- I have every intention of using the PEAR Package infrastructure, and
greedily await its arrival. However, we need to be able to create 'builds'
of our source trees in the traditional sense, which involves file copying
and processing. Some of those processes are standard, such as creating
distribution tarballs, etc - some are custom to binarycloud (we use 'tags'
which allow us to abstract strings from source, and some other neat-o stuff)
If we could integrate build capability into the Package files (or extend the
package infrastructure to do what we need) I would obviously be ecstatic.
Does that fit with what you suggest?