Re: 'PHPMake'

alex black wrote: > > - I have every intention of using the PEAR Package infrastructure, and > greedily await its arrival. However, we need to be able to create 'builds' > of our source trees in the traditional sense, which involves file copying > and processing. Some of those processes are standard, such as creating > distribution tarballs, etc - some are custom to binarycloud (we use 'tags' > which allow us to abstract strings from source, and some other neat-o stuff) > > If we could integrate build capability into the Package files (or extend the > package infrastructure to do what we need) I would obviously be ecstatic. > The system is very easy to extend, just add a new command (ie: "make") to the "pear" script and put the code needed for it in a class like the other commands do. I personaly find interesting this thing. What others think about adding "make capabilities" to the "pear" script? Tomas V.V.Cox