package.xml format correct?

From: Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:36:50 +0000
Subject: package.xml format correct?
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2365@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hi all, we're adding pear-style package declarations to binarycloud - I have a simple question. Our base directory is binarycloud, under that we have a full tree (unlike the logically flat tree for packages in pear). Given a 'base' directory of binarycloud/ and an install path of binarycloud/base/core, is this package xml correct: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> <package> <status>devel</status> <name>binarycloud.core</name> <maintainer> <user>turing</user> <name>Alex Black</name> <email>enigma@turingstudio.com</email> </maintainer> <release> <version>r2-pre1</version> <date>2001-10-10</date> </release> <filelist> ***** This right? <dir name="base/core" baseinstalldir="binarycloud"> <file>Auth.php</file> <file>Debug.php</file> <file>Err.php</file> <file>Lang.php</file> <file>Page.php</file> <file>Request.php</file> <file>Sess.php</file> </dir> </filelist> </package> ---------- Btw, in the future (when there is a functional package-get for pear) how would a user handle a get of binarycloud? A long time ago, Stig mentioned that it would probably be maintained as an external package - do you see a user doing something like $ pear-get packages.binarycloud.com binarycloud.core ? ---- is anyone else having problems getting to the news server? I can't get a connection with a mac news client, but I _can_ with outlook express on win. very strange. tia all. :) _alex

« previous php.pear.dev (#2365) next »